45.236 have signed.
Đinh Thị Huyền Thư
UPDATE : On May 10, 2019, the Ministry of Health officially issued a letter to the case of Doctor. Hoang Cong Luong.
Article analyzing wrongful procedure posted on Vietnamnet.vn: "Lesson wrong and requires an integrity of justice"
UPDATE : Date 03/22/2019 Dr. Hoang Cong Luong: Text of Vietnam Medical Association sent to the law enforcement agencies and proposals for the verdict of the people's courts Hoa Binh city.
UPDATE : June 3, 2019, More than 43,000 signatures supported. Doctor Hoang Cong Luong has filed an appeal :
UPDATE : January 23, 2019 , has passed the record of 35,000 signatures of support. The number continues to increase every minute while the trial is entering the "heated" debate
UPDATE : December 27, 2018 - There were 26,155 the signatory support for Dr. Hoang Cong Luong; - 18 families of 18 victims wrote a fifth petition to release Dr. Luong. - Previously, more than 15,400 people signed the Supporting Form.
UPDATE : 19h23 of December 5, 2018, 20,000 loving hearts signed the "Proposal petition for doctor Hoang Cong Luong", and there will be many more signatures for the young doctor who wishes and hope that the upcoming trial will be tried fairly, objectively, with the right people, right offenses, without neglect and without wrongdoing on innocent people. Thank you all, the community for joining hands with Dr. Hoang Cong Luong!
SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM
Etc: " Vindication to doctor Hoang Cong Luong"
To : - PRESIDENT OF NGUYEN PHU TRONG, SUPREME JUDGE LE MINH TRI - MINISTER OF PUBLIC SECURITY TO LAM – CHAIR OF PEOPLE'S COMMITTEE OF HOA BINH PROVINCE – CHAIR THE PEOPLE'S COMMITTEE OF HOA BINH CITY- NATIONAL ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE
Hanoi, September 19, 2018
We, the following citizens, would like to recommend to the Agency the following: Through the media, we learned about the cause of death of patients in dialysis case in Hoa Binh General Hospital. Binh on May 29, 2017, was concluded by the inspection agency as a result of chemical residues (HF) and (HCL) in the RO water system used for hemodialysis (240-260 times higher than the permitted level). ) after maintenance and repair of RO system. This has absolutely no causal relationship with regard to the medical examination and giving orders of Dr. Hoang Cong Luong as well as physicians and nurses in the artificial kidney unit of Hoa Binh General Hospital's General Hospital. The conclusion of the Medical Council of Hoa Binh Department of Health also shows that the doctors and nurses have done the right profession and profession first, during and after the fatal accident in accordance with the Hospital Regulations. Dr. Luong is not an engineer or technician of the Hospital Supplies and Equipment Department, nor is he directly responsible for the maintenance and repair of the RO system under the hospital's contract to cause resulting in chemical residues leading to death for the victims. Process of handover of RO system after repair and maintenance at Hoa Binh General Hospital Completely none of them have ever been done, so Mr. Luong cannot have any sloppy behavior in that process. In the bs treatment position, after clinical examination for the patient and is responsible for preparing equipment to notify the washing of the kidney machine, testing the normal kidney machine, the conductivity meter of the system RO system ( mandatory and unique condition to identify system safety before ordering dialysis for patients) in the safe range, considering the safety indicator, the doctor orders a dialysis for the patient. In fact, nowadays, in addition to visiting patients with good health, dialysis and observing the conductivity meter to indicate the safety index after washing and testing machines of nurses, doctors The treating physician has nothing to know whether the RO system is safe or unsafe, and it is even more difficult to identify the safety alarm clock but still have the potential for errors. This issue is beyond the control, expertise and knowledge of the treating physician. Because there is no procedure for repairing, maintaining, operating, and using, there is no document stipulating that after repairing and maintaining the RO system, there must be the direction of the Head of Department, which allows the doctor to issue a medical order. dialysis should not be able to accuse bs Luong of negligence. Because there is no internal document of the hospital that prescribes that the treating physician should order the opinion of the Dean, Mr. Luong has no fault of negligence because he did not foresee the deadly consequences of using water. RO without the direction of the Dean. In this case, the accused Bui Manh Quoc was asked to prosecute the crime "Accidental death" under Clause 2, Article 98 of the 1999 Penal Code now prescribed in Clause 2, Article 128 of the 2015 Penal Code, amended in 2017 and Mr. Luong was also asked to prosecute for the crime and the law is exactly the same as the suspect Bui Manh Quoc but Mr. Luong is not an accomplice to Quoc in this case because his job is to repair and maintain the equipment. Mr. Luong's job is to examine and treat patients. On March 23, 2018, the Vietnam General Association of Medicine issued Official Letter No. 80 of the Secretary General Dr. Le Gia Vinh, stating: ' suspects Bui Manh Quoc, who was asked to prosecute "Accidentally killing" under Clause 2, Article 98 of the 1999 Penal Code, which is prescribed in Clause 2, Article 128 of the 2015 Penal Code, amended in 2017 and bs Luong also The prosecution of the crime and the law are exactly the same as the suspect Bui Manh Quoc, but Mr. Luong did not have to be an accomplice to Quoc in this case because the job of Quoc is to repair and maintain the equipment and the work of Mr. Luong medical examination and treatment for patients. On March 23, 2018, the Vietnam General Association of Medicine issued Official Letter No. 80 of the Secretary-General Professor Dr. Le Gia Vinh stating: ' suspects Bui Manh Quoc, who was asked to prosecute "Accidentally killing" under Clause 2, Article 98 of the 1999 Penal Code, which is prescribed in Clause 2, Article 128 of the 2015 Penal Code, amended in 2017 and bs Luong also The prosecution of the crime and the law are exactly the same as the suspect Bui Manh Quoc, but Mr. Luong did not have to be an accomplice to Quoc in this case because the job of Quoc is to repair and maintain the equipment and the work of Mr. Luong medical examination and treatment for patients. On March 23, 2018, the Vietnam General Association of Medicine issued Official Letter No. 80 of the Secretary-General Professor Dr. Le Gia Vinh stating: 'According to the provisions of the law on medical examination and treatment, according to the hospital's regulations, Mr. Luong has no functions and duties to check the quality of medical equipment and water quality ”. On July 27, 2018, Official Dispatch No. 235 of Dr. Trinh Thi Le Tram - Head of TV, Director & Social Affairs Department of the Vietnam Medical Association stated: “ Hoa Binh General Hospital has not issued a regulation on the repair process of RO water purification system, so it is necessary to reconsider the responsibility. Mr. Luong's responsibility is stipulated in Article 34 of the Law on Medical Examination and Treatment, providing for the right to be protected when a disaster occurs to a patient ” . During the second investigation, the Hoa Binh Provincial Police Investigation Agency also concluded that another cause of death in the incident on May 29, 2017 was as follows: “One of the main causes of death after dialysis for patients at Hoa Binh Hemodialysis Unit - Hoa Binh Province is insufficient and necessary human resource allocation ”(pages 11 and 12) additional investigation (2). Thus, with this conclusion, the cause of death of 8 patients (later the 9th patient died) is due to chemical residues after repair, maintenance of RO system and workforce allocation.at the Artificial Kidney Unit-BVDK Hoa Binh province. Both of these causes are not related to the work of the treating doctor, not related to the responsibility of Mr. Luong, so Mr. Luong has no negligent errors that create these two causes. Is the incomplete and necessary personnel arrangement causing fatal consequences a sloppy or overconfident error? Moreover, Mr. Luong does not have the right and responsibility to arrange human resources, so he expects the procedure-conducting agencies to consider cautiously, impartially and objectively the causes of deadly consequences in order to make the right decisions according to regulations. law. On the other hand, it is also necessary to have accurate assessments and conclusions about the main cause of fatal consequences due to incomplete and necessary personnel arrangement, the cause of chemical residues (HF) after repairs, maintenance of RO system is a "secondary" or "secondary" cause to determine the facts of the case, not to offend me, to unjustly innocent people. The conclusion of the second investigation has intentionally truncated the content: suspects Bui Manh Quoc handed over to accused Tran Van Son the RO system after repairing on the afternoon of May 28, 2017; accused Tran Van Son handed over by phone to nurse Do Thi Diep on the afternoon of May 28, 2017, the RO system was repaired and could operate normally. papers for nursing Do Thi Diep; Before the briefing of the Department of Medical Materials and Devices in the morning of May 29, 2017, Tran Van Son also reported that the head of the department is Mr. Tran Van Thang that the RO2 system has been repaired, Mr. Thang instructed Son Hoan. improve paperwork to liquidate contracts (administrative procedures), this was accused by Tran Van Son, Mr. Tran Van Thang testified at the first instance trial and was presented in the contents of the first investigation conclusion (January 15, 2018) and the first supplementary investigation conclusion (July 4). / 2018). At the beginning of the morning of May 29, 2017, nurse Do Thi Diep informed all staff of the Artificial Renal Unit that the RO2 system has been repaired, can work normally and has been provided by the Department of Materials- Medical equipment handed over. The omission of the Second Amendment of the Investigation Report with the above contents has falsified the objective truths of the case.
Therefore, we make this petition, we hope that all of you agencies consider and accept the petitions of the above mentioned families to hear the case objectively, comprehensively and in accordance with the law; ensuring the legal rights and benefits for Mr. Luong to be vindicated so that he can return to the medical treatment and rescue work at a difficult mountain hospital soon. We believe in justice and hope through this case, the treating doctors will no longer have to worry about the quality of equipment, medicine ... but focus on the noble work of medicine. is healing, saving people.
Dinh Thi Huyen Thu
And more than 41,000 terms that signed hereafter
Let's continue sharing, signing for support and sending the petition to the authorities before the upcoming trial date
Some articles published in the press:
The dialysis case of 8 deaths: from the legal perspective
Doctor Hoang Cong Luong: I am looking forward to the trial because I'm 100% innocent of my belief
Prosecutor offers to return files, admit signs of dealing or blaming Dr. Luong!
Dialysis patients in Hoa Binh: We will make a petition about Dr. Luong's case:
incident in Hoa Binh: The family members of the victims want the court to declare doctor Luong innocent